Politico’s DISTURBING 2026 Prediction

Masked soldiers holding rifles in front of a monument.

Alarmist media outlets and political opportunists are stoking fears of an imminent American civil war, exploiting legitimate frustrations over polarization while experts confirm no organized conflict is remotely on the horizon.

Story Snapshot

  • Media speculation about civil war escalates despite expert consensus that risks remain negligible with no military splits or secessionist movements
  • Politico’s 2026 midterm scenarios predict candidate assassinations and National Guard clashes, echoing dangerous rhetoric from the left
  • Recent polls show only 5.7% expect civil war soon, contradicting alarmist narratives pushed by establishment outlets
  • Real threat stems from social media-driven lone actors, not organized rebellion, while rhetoric undermines national unity

Manufactured Crisis Narrative

The phrase “civil war brewing” represents manufactured hysteria rather than factual analysis of America’s current state. Since 2019, mainstream media outlets have amplified speculation about internal conflict, citing partisan polarization as evidence of impending violence. Boston University historians examined this rhetoric in 2019, concluding that talk of civil war constitutes exaggeration of existing political divides rather than genuine warnings of organized rebellion. A Rasmussen poll from that year found 31% of voters considered civil war likely within five years, yet no concrete indicators of such conflict have materialized. This disconnect reveals how media narratives exploit legitimate concerns about polarization to generate fear-based engagement.

Biden-Era Polarization Fueled Fears

The outgoing Biden administration’s divisive policies intensified partisan tensions that alarmists now weaponize. Post-2016 polarization accelerated under policies promoting illegal immigration, government overreach, and attacks on traditional values. The previous administration’s weaponization of federal agencies against conservatives, combined with social media censorship targeting right-leaning voices, created genuine frustration among patriotic Americans. However, characterizing this justified anger as precursor to civil war ignores critical context: America maintains a strong economy, unified military command structure, and zero credible secessionist movements. The real division stems from leftist elites dismissing constitutional principles, not from armed conflict readiness among citizens.

Politico’s Dangerous Speculation

Politico published scenarios in January 2026 predicting midterm violence including candidate assassinations, AI deepfake-enabled murders, National Guard clashes, and election postponements leading to “American Troubles” resembling Northern Ireland’s decades-long conflict. These hypothetical black swan events lack supporting evidence yet receive amplification from establishment media eager to portray Trump supporters as violent extremists. The scenarios reference potential National Guard deployments to Democratic cities and continuity of government preparations by figures like Nancy Pelosi, framing constitutional law enforcement as precursor to insurgency. This irresponsible speculation ignores that sporadic political violence stems from radicalized individuals, not organized conservative movements defending constitutional principles.

Expert Analysis Contradicts Hysteria

The Center for Strategic and International Studies assessed civil war risks as negligible in 2025, citing absence of economic collapse, military defections, or territorial secession efforts. CSIS identifies social media-driven lone actors as the genuine threat, not coordinated rebellion. Military experts note government forces maintain overwhelming capability advantages while no resource conflicts or competing sovereignty claims exist. Surveys conducted in 2023-2024 found only 3.8% of Americans desire civil war, with 5.7% expecting one soon—dramatically lower than the 2019 Rasmussen figures media continues citing. This factual analysis exposes how alarmist rhetoric serves political agendas rather than informing citizens about actual security threats.

Rural America’s Quiet Strength

Speculation about urban-rural conflict ignores that conservative communities prioritize family values, constitutional governance, and peaceful resolution over violence. While leftist commentators frame rural areas as potential battlegrounds, these regions demonstrate commitment to law and order that contrasts sharply with urban chaos under Democratic leadership. The reference to “8 trillion bullets” in red states reflects Second Amendment rights exercised responsibly by citizens concerned about government overreach, not preparation for offensive action. President Trump’s return to office in 2026 provides opportunity to restore constitutional order and address legitimate grievances through democratic processes, making armed conflict even less plausible than alarmists suggest.

Sources:

Are We Headed for Another Civil War? – Boston University

Black Swan Events 2026 – Politico

Is the United States Headed Toward Civil War? – CSIS

Is the US Facing a Civil War? – Abolitionist Law Center

Civil War Comes to the West Part II – Military Strategy Magazine